Skip to content
BETTING & CASINO INDUSTRY

Security for iGaming

WehelpiGamingoperators,onlinecasinos,sportsbooks,andbettingplatformsdefendagainstpaymentfraud,account-takeoverattacks,bonusabuse,andAPIexploitationwithsecuritytestingalignedwithONJN,MGA,UKGC,andPCIDSSrequirements.Thehouseshouldalwayswinnevertheattacker.

Industry snapshot

A distinctive risk profile

The house should always win — never the attacker. iGaming platforms combine regulated gambling, high-volume payments, and complex bonus economies, making them one of the most aggressively targeted verticals online.

40+
Regulators
ONJN · MGA · UKGC · GGL · ADM · KSA · more
PCI
Payment scope
Deposits · withdrawals · cashier
Bonus
Fraud economy
Hunters · farms · abuse
API
Primary attack surface
REST · GraphQL · mobile
Compliance

Regulatory Frameworks

Every engagement is mapped to the frameworks that matter most in this industry — so each finding directly supports your compliance posture.

ONJN (Romania)
OUG 77/2009 and OUG 82/2023 require licensed-lab certification (RNG + system audit) before launch and periodic technical re-audits, including penetration testing and security-control verification
MGA (Malta)
Gaming Authorizations and Compliance Directive mandates annual system audits, independent penetration testing of critical platform components, and ISO/IEC 27001-aligned controls for B2C and B2B licensees
UKGC (United Kingdom)
Remote Gambling and Software Technical Standards (RTS) + security-audit requirements mandate independent security testing and an annual security assessment of remote technical equipment
Gibraltar Gambling Commissioner
Gambling Act 2005 + Code of Practice: license conditions require independent testing of gaming systems and periodic security audits
Isle of Man GSC
Online Gambling Regulation Act 2001 and supporting Regulations: technical compliance audits and security reviews are required at licensing and on an ongoing basis
Alderney AGCC
AGCC Regulations and Technical Standards: independent system and security testing is a condition of Category 1 and Category 2 licenses
Sweden Spelinspektionen
Spellagen (SFS 2018:1138) and SIFS technical regulations require independent system certification and periodic security testing by accredited labs
Denmark Spillemyndigheden
Executive Orders on Online Casino / Betting: certification and annual security audits including penetration testing are mandatory for licensees
Germany GGL
GlüStV 2021 (Interstate Gambling Treaty) + Technical Guidelines require pre-launch certification, monitoring via OASIS/LUGAS, and independent IT-security audits including penetration testing
France ANJ
Décret 2019-1061 and ANJ technical decisions require pre-launch certification of software and infrastructure and periodic security-compliance audits
Spain DGOJ
Real Decreto 1614/2011 and Resolución General Ordenación del Juego: technical, operational and security audits including penetration testing are part of the licensing regime
Italy ADM
Concessioni requirements: annual penetration testing and technical audits of the gaming platform are mandatory, with evidence submitted to the regulator
Netherlands KSA
Remote Gambling Act (Koa) and Regulations: licensees must undergo initial certification and annual independent security audits including penetration testing
Belgium Gaming Commission
Gaming Act 1999 + Royal Decrees: technical and security audits are required at licensing and renewal for classes A, A+, B, B+, F1 and F1+
Portugal SRIJ
Decreto-Lei n.º 66/2015: mandatory pre-launch certification and ongoing compliance audits including technical and security testing
Greece HGC
Law 4002/2011 as amended + HGC Technical Regulations: independent laboratory certification and security audits are required for each licensed vertical
Czech Republic MF
Act No. 186/2016 Coll. (Gambling Act): technical certification by an authorized testing body and ongoing security compliance are required
Bulgaria State Commission on Gambling
Gambling Act and NRA Technical Requirements: licensed-lab technical certification and security audits are mandatory
USA state regulators
NJ DGE, PA PGCB, NV NGCB (Reg 14), MI MGCB, WV LC, CO DOR, IN IGC, IA IRGC, VA OLR, OH, CT, MA, NY, LA, KS, AZ, AR, MD, MS, ME, WY, TN: all require independent lab testing (GLI/BMM) plus periodic penetration testing and technical audits of the gaming platform
Canada iGaming Ontario
Registrar's Standards for Internet Gaming require an annual penetration test, a yearly IT-security audit, and independent game/system certification before go-live
Canada
AGCO, BCLC, AGLC, Loto-Québec, SaskGaming, Atlantic Lottery: provincial operator standards require independent lab certification and regular security testing
Brazil SPA / Ministry of Finance
Law 14.790/2023 and SPA/MF Portarias (2024–2025) require pre-launch certification by accredited labs and annual security and penetration testing of the betting platform
Colombia Coljuegos
Law 643/2001 and Decree 1451/2015: licensees must undergo technical certification and annual technology-audit including security testing
Peru MINCETUR
Law 31557 (effective 2024) and its Regulations require independent technical certification, annual audits, and security testing before and during operation
Argentina
LOTBA (CABA) and IPLyC (provinces) require lab certification and periodic technical/security audits for each licensed operator
Philippines PAGCOR
E-Gaming Regulatory Framework requires independent lab certification (GLI or equivalent), annual system-security reviews and penetration testing
Singapore GRA
Gambling Control Act 2022, Casino Control Act and Technical Standards: mandatory system certification and periodic security audits including penetration testing
Japan
Integrated Resorts Implementation Act 2018 and CRC rules require security assessments, intrusion testing and periodic technical audits of casino management and monitoring systems
Australia state regulators
VGCCC (VIC), L&GNSW / ILGA, OLGR Queensland, GWC Western Australia, SA CBS, ACT GRC and Liquor & Gaming Tasmania: each requires technical standards compliance, lab certification and, for online verticals, periodic security and penetration testing
India
Sikkim Online Gaming Act 2008 and Nagaland Online Games of Skill Act 2015 require independent lab certification and technical/security audits for licensed operators
South Africa
National Gambling Act 7 of 2004 and provincial gambling boards (WCGRB, GGB, ECGBB, KZNGBB): licensees must pass technical certification and ongoing security audits for interactive and casino products
UAE GCGRA
General Commercial Gaming Regulatory Authority (est. 2023) Technical Standards require pre-launch certification, annual penetration testing and IT-security audits
Curaçao Gaming Authority (CGA)
new Landsverordening op de Kansspelen (LOK 2024) replaces the old master-license model and requires licensees to demonstrate independent security testing and ongoing technical audits
Kahnawake Gaming Commission
Regulations require independent testing of gaming systems and periodic security audits by accredited labs
GLI standards
GLI-11 (Casino gaming devices), GLI-19 (Interactive gaming systems), GLI-33 (Event wagering) and GLI-GS4 (Security controls) define the technical and security tests labs must run to certify an operator
WLA Security Control Standard
certification required of World Lottery Association members mandates penetration testing, vulnerability management and an ISO/IEC 27001-aligned ISMS
ISO/IEC 27001:2022
certification requires periodic vulnerability assessments and penetration testing as part of control A.8.8 (management of technical vulnerabilities) and A.8.29 (security testing in development)
SOC 2 Type II
Trust Services Criteria CC7.1–CC7.2 require vulnerability scanning and penetration testing to evidence security-monitoring controls during the audit period
PCI DSS v4.0
Requirements 11.3 and 11.4 mandate internal and external penetration testing at least annually and after any significant change across the deposit, withdrawal, cashier and voucher flows
GDPR Article 32
requires a process for regular testing, assessing and evaluating the effectiveness of technical and organizational measures — independent penetration testing is the industry-accepted means of evidencing compliance
Methodology

Testing methodology

A tested, repeatable approach covering every layer of the modern environment relevant to this industry.

01 · PHASE

Account takeover simulation

credential stuffing, MFA bypass, password reset flaws, and session hijacking against player accounts

02 · PHASE

Bonus abuse & promo fraud testing

bonus-hunting techniques, wagering-requirement bypass, account-farm detection, and linked-account analysis

03 · PHASE

Payment fraud and cash-out testing

deposit manipulation, withdrawal abuse, chargeback flows, and KYC-spoofing resilience

04 · PHASE

Game & RNG integrity review

in-play manipulation attempts, bet settlement bypass, and RTP-affecting bugs in game logic and bet-placement APIs

05 · PHASE

API & mobile app testing

REST/GraphQL betting APIs, deep link abuse, runtime tampering, and anti-tamper evaluation of iOS/Android apps

06 · PHASE

Anti-cheat and bot protection assessment

scripted client detection, rate limit resilience, and anomaly-detection validation on high-volume endpoints

Threat landscape

Threats facing this sector today

Every security engagement is scoped based on the attack patterns that actually hit this sector — not a generic checklist.

Account takeover

Credential stuffing, MFA bypass, and SIM swap attacks against player accounts with cashable balances.

Bonus abuse & account farms

Industrial-scale bonus hunting, multi-account farms, and wagering-requirement bypass eroding promo margins.

Payment fraud & chargebacks

Deposit manipulation, stolen-card abuse, and chargeback cycles targeting cashier and withdrawal flows.

API abuse and bet manipulation

BOLA, rate limit bypass, and business-logic flaws in betting APIs that allow bet settlement tricks or in-play exploitation.

Bot and scripted client abuse

Automated clients exploiting latency, odds movement, or VIP bonus flows to extract value at scale.

Regulatory and compliance exposure

KYC, AML, self exclusion, and responsible-gaming control failures that trigger fines and license reviews.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Ready to keep the house winning?

Talk to our team about a security assessment tailored to the unique risk profile of your organization.

Request a Security Assessment